From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

T.W. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Mar 28, 1991
576 So. 2d 936 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-1806.

March 28, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Seminole County, Leonard V. Wood, J.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and James T. Cook, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David S. Morgan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


The juvenile appellant, T.W., challenges a restitution order imposed without an evidentiary hearing and without the submission by the state of any documentary or testimonial evidence in regard to the value of a wrecked vehicle.

At a disposition hearing, the prosecutor simply advised the court that he had spoken to the victim and was told that the vehicle had no insurance and was worth between $1,000.00 and $1,500.00. The trial court ordered restitution of $1,000.00, and expressly retained jurisdiction for the purpose of raising the amount of restitution ordered upon the presentation of further corroborative evidence. The defense objected to the absence of any admissible evidence as to damage. That objection should have been sustained. Accordingly, we reverse the restitution order entered below and remand for an evidentiary hearing thereon.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and HARRIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

T.W. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Mar 28, 1991
576 So. 2d 936 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

T.W. v. State

Case Details

Full title:T.W., A CHILD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Mar 28, 1991

Citations

576 So. 2d 936 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Rader v. State

The State correctly concedes that the order must be reversed and remanded for a new hearing because…