From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tuttle v. Stewart Title of Nev. Holding

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Dec 12, 2013
3:13-cv-00373-HDM-WGC (D. Nev. Dec. 12, 2013)

Opinion

3:13-cv-00373-HDM-WGC

12-12-2013

INEZ TUTTLE, Plaintiff, v. STEWART TITLE OF NEVADA HOLDING, STEWART TITLE COMPANY, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff filed her complaint in this action on May 14, 2013. Plaintiff's complaint seeks to set aside the nonjudicial foreclosure sale of 628 Don Drive, Zephyr Cove, Nevada, a property in which plaintiff and her husband owned a 73% interest. On July 12, 2013, defendants removed plaintiff's complaint to this court. From the record in this action and judicially noticeable documents available on the public record, it appears that a quiet title action with respect to 628 Don Drive, Zephyr Cove, Nevada was filed in state court after plaintiff filed her complaint in state court but before the complaint was removed to this court. (See Doc. #24; Ord. Expunging Lis Pendens, Case No. 13-cv-0148, in Ninth Judicial District Court for the State of Nevada, available at http://rdb.co. douglas.nv.us/docsearch/docs/832708.pdf).

Because plaintiff's action seeks to set aside the foreclosure sale of 628 Don Drive, it might be considered an action in rem or quasi in rem under Nevada law. See Chapman v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., 651 F.3d 1059 (9th Cir. 2011); Chapman v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., 302 P.3d 1103 (Nev. 2013). If this action is in rem or quasi in rem, the court cannot proceed so long as Case No. 13-cv-0148 remains pending in Ninth Judicial District court. See Azucena v. Aztec Foreclosure Corp., 2013 WL 3972385 (9th Cir. Aug. 5, 2013). Accordingly, on or before December 27, 2013, the parties shall advise the court as to whether Case No. 13-cv-0148 remains pending in the Ninth Judicial District Court, and whether, to the extent known, any other still pending state court in rem or quasi in rem actions were filed with respect to 628 Don Drive before this action was removed. Should any such actions remain pending, the parties shall further brief, on or before December 27, 2013, whether plaintiff's complaint in this action should be considered an action in personam, or whether it should be considered an action in rem or quasi in rem.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Tuttle v. Stewart Title of Nev. Holding

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Dec 12, 2013
3:13-cv-00373-HDM-WGC (D. Nev. Dec. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Tuttle v. Stewart Title of Nev. Holding

Case Details

Full title:INEZ TUTTLE, Plaintiff, v. STEWART TITLE OF NEVADA HOLDING, STEWART TITLE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Dec 12, 2013

Citations

3:13-cv-00373-HDM-WGC (D. Nev. Dec. 12, 2013)