From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tursi v. Perla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 21, 1997
241 A.D.2d 518 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

July 21, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O'Brien, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

According due deference to the trial court on matters of credibility, we conclude that the trial court's findings, including the determination that there was no contract between the parties, are not against the weight of the evidence or contrary to law. Therefore, they will not be disturbed (see, Brooklyn Queens El. Co. v. Excel Assocs., 115 A.D.2d 630).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are either raised for the first time on appeal, and thus, not considered, or without merit.

Miller, J. P., Friedmann, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tursi v. Perla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 21, 1997
241 A.D.2d 518 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Tursi v. Perla

Case Details

Full title:NOEL TURSI, Appellant, v. DANIEL V. PERLA, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 21, 1997

Citations

241 A.D.2d 518 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
663 N.Y.S.2d 984

Citing Cases

Xand Corp. v. Reliable System Alternatives Corp.

In this regard, the evidence and testimony established the agreed-upon commission schedules, the amount of…

Peters v. Nicotera

Plaintiff met her burden of establishing that there was a confidential relationship between defendant and…