From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner v. Gannett Suburban Newspaper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 5, 1999
260 A.D.2d 370 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

April 5, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the cross motion is denied, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff applied for, was granted, and accepted benefits for the injuries at issue pursuant to the Workers' Compensation Law on her representation that she was an employee of the defendant and that her injuries arose in the course of her employment. Accordingly, she is precluded from claiming in this action that she was not an employee of the defendant, and this action is barred by the exclusivity provisions of the Workers' Compensation Law ( see, Workers' Compensation Law §§ 10, 11, 29; Werner v. State of New York, 53 N.Y.2d 346; Monteverde v. Delta Intl. Mach. Corp., 215 A.D.2d 240; French v. Shaft, 154 A.D.2d 336; Richiusa v. Kahn Lbr. Millwork Co., 148 A.D.2d 690).

S. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Thompson and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Turner v. Gannett Suburban Newspaper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 5, 1999
260 A.D.2d 370 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Turner v. Gannett Suburban Newspaper

Case Details

Full title:PAMELA TURNER, Respondent, v. GANNETT SUBURBAN NEWSPAPER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 5, 1999

Citations

260 A.D.2d 370 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
687 N.Y.S.2d 695

Citing Cases

Wysocki v. Balalis

The Supreme Court also erred in denying Prevail's motion. Since the plaintiff was employed by Prevail and…

Stewart v. Glory Bee Realty Management Corp.

Since Penny Stewart and Lanier applied for and accepted workers' compensation benefits as a result of this…