From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turcio v. Carnival Cruise Lines

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 17, 1999
727 So. 2d 1138 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-588

Opinion filed March 17, 1999.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Steve Levine, Judge; L.T. No. 95-1615.

Charles R. Lipcon; Cooper Wolfe, and Sharon L. Wolfe, for appellant.

Mase Gassenheimer, and James D. Gassenheimer, for appellee.

Before JORGENSON, GERSTEN, and SORONDO, JJ.


CONFESSION OF ERROR


The appellee correctly concedes that the trial court erred in dismissing the case for lack of prosecution because the record reveals that documents were filed within the year preceding the motion to dismiss. Accordingly, because there was record activity within one year, we reverse and remand to the trial court for further proceedings. See Scharlin v. Broward County Property Appraisal Adjustment Board, 500 So.2d 345 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Turcio v. Carnival Cruise Lines

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 17, 1999
727 So. 2d 1138 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Turcio v. Carnival Cruise Lines

Case Details

Full title:JOSE FRANCISCO TURCIO, Appellant, v. CARNIVAL CRUISE LINES, INC., Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 17, 1999

Citations

727 So. 2d 1138 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Torrejon v. Martin

The filing of the defendants' Rule 1.260(a)(1) motion to dismiss constitutes record activity directed toward…