From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tuoza v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp.

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Dec 2, 2020
309 So. 3d 268 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 3D20-1373

12-02-2020

Oscar TUOZA, et al., Appellants, v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellee.

Shield Law Group of Florida, LLC, and Jamie Alvarez (Davie), for appellants. Paul R. Pearcy, P.A., and Maureen G. Pearcy, for appellee.


Shield Law Group of Florida, LLC, and Jamie Alvarez (Davie), for appellants.

Paul R. Pearcy, P.A., and Maureen G. Pearcy, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, HENDON and LOBREE, JJ.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellee's motion and dismiss this appeal without prejudice as one taken from a non-final, non-appealable order. See Cicco v. Luckett Tobaccos, Inc., 934 So. 2d 560, 561 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) ("We have long adhered to the rule that piecemeal appeals will not be permitted where claims are interrelated and involve the same transaction and the same parties remain in the suit."); S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So. 2d 97, 99 (Fla. 1974) ("Generally, the test employed by the appellate court to determine finality of an order, judgment or decree is whether the order in question constitutes an end to the judicial labor in the cause, and nothing further remains to be done by the court to effectuate a termination of the cause as between the parties directly affected.").

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Tuoza v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp.

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Dec 2, 2020
309 So. 3d 268 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Tuoza v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Oscar Tuoza, et al., Appellants, v. Citizens Property Insurance…

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Dec 2, 2020

Citations

309 So. 3d 268 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)