Opinion
02-18-2016
In the Matter of MING TUNG, et al., Appellants, v. CHINA BUDDHIST ASSOCIATION, et al., Respondents.
Alexander Palmer Kelly, New York City, for appellants. Capell Barnett Matalon & Schoenfeld LLP, New York City (Joseph Milano of counsel), for respondents.
Alexander Palmer Kelly, New York City, for appellants.
Capell Barnett Matalon & Schoenfeld LLP, New York City (Joseph Milano of counsel), for respondents.
Opinion
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order of the Appellate Division affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated by Justice Judith J. Gische at the Appellate Division, First Department (124 A.D.3d 13, 996 N.Y.S.2d 236 [2014] ), and certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary.
Chief Judge DiFIORE and Judges PIGOTT, RIVERA, ABDUS–SALAAM, STEIN, FAHEY and GARCIA concur.