From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tumim v. Palefsky

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Jan 23, 1979
7 Mass. App. Ct. 847 (Mass. App. Ct. 1979)

Opinion

January 23, 1979.

Robert L. Burke for the defendant.

Jeffrey N. Moxon for the plaintiff.


It is well settled that a clause providing for the resolution by arbitration of disputes arising under an agreement is not jurisdictional, Morales Rivera v. Sea Land of P.R. Inc., 418 F.2d 725, 726 (1st Cir. 1969), and that the parties waive the arbitration clause if (as we infer from the appendix is the case here) they proceed to a trial of the issues in dispute without making a request for arbitration. Agoos Kid Co. v. Blumenthal Import Corp., 282 Mass. 1, 14 (1933). Commercial Iron Metal Co. v. Bache Halsey Stuart, Inc., 581 F.2d 246, 249 (10th Cir. 1978). DeSapio v. Kohlmeyer, 35 N.Y.2d 402, 405 (1974). Zimmerman v. Cohen, 236 N.Y. 15, 19 (1923). Domke, The Law and Practice of Commercial Arbitration § 19.01, at 181 (1968). We have discovered no authority, nor can we think of any sound reason, for applying a different rule in the case of an arbitration clause appearing in a separation agreement incorporated in a divorce judgment. No other issue has been argued in this appeal.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Tumim v. Palefsky

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Jan 23, 1979
7 Mass. App. Ct. 847 (Mass. App. Ct. 1979)
Case details for

Tumim v. Palefsky

Case Details

Full title:ETHEL P. TUMIM vs. BERTRAM NORMAN PALEFSKY

Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Jan 23, 1979

Citations

7 Mass. App. Ct. 847 (Mass. App. Ct. 1979)
384 N.E.2d 1253

Citing Cases

Weiss v. Atholl, No

But simply filing suit on a claim and requesting arbitration shortly thereafter does not result in a waiver…

Valley Const. v. Perry Host Management

Board of Education of Township High School District No. 205 Cook County v. Faculty Association of District…