From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tumbridge v. Read

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 17, 1888
16 N.E. 484 (N.Y. 1888)

Opinion

Argued January 23, 1888

Decided April 17, 1888

Robert G. Ingersoll and Christopher Fine for appellant.

Brewster Kissam for respondent.


PECKHAM, J., reads for reversal and new trial; DANFORTH and FINCH, JJ., concur; RUGER, Ch. J., concurs in result; EARL, J., reads for affirmance; ANDREWS, J., concurs.

Judgment reversed.


Summaries of

Tumbridge v. Read

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 17, 1888
16 N.E. 484 (N.Y. 1888)
Case details for

Tumbridge v. Read

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM TUMBRIDGE, Respondent, v . CASSIUS H. READ et al., Appellants

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 17, 1888

Citations

16 N.E. 484 (N.Y. 1888)
109 N.Y. 641

Citing Cases

Hunt et al. v. S Y Cattle Co.

So where a written contract is declared on, the party will not be allowed to prove a subsequent parol…