From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tully v. Town of North Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 11, 1983
93 A.D.2d 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

April 11, 1983


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Town of North Hempstead (the town) appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Velsor, J.), dated September 23, 1982, which denied its motion for leave to serve an amended answer. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to plaintiff. Plaintiff has alleged, inter alia, that he was injured as the result of the town's failure to properly regulate traffic at the intersection where the accident occurred. Under these circumstances, plaintiff was not required to comply with the notice requirements of section 65-a Town of the Town Law and section 26-1 of the North Hempstead Code (see Doremus v Incorporated Vil. of Lynbrook, 18 N.Y.2d 362; see, also, Sharapata v Town of Islip, 82 A.D.2d 350, 362, affd 56 N.Y.2d 332). Gibbons, J.P., Thompson, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tully v. Town of North Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 11, 1983
93 A.D.2d 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Tully v. Town of North Hempstead

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL J. TULLY, III, Respondent, v. TOWN OF NORTH HEMPSTEAD, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 11, 1983

Citations

93 A.D.2d 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

De Francisci v. Baron

The court stated that the notice statute refers "to actual physical defects in the surface of a street,…

Brennan v. Gagliano

"The affidavit of an official charged with the responsibility of keeping an indexed record of all notices of…