From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tullett and Tokyo Forex, Inc. v. Linker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 11, 1996
226 A.D.2d 182 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 11, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Lorraine Miller, J.).


We agree with the IAS Court that, at this stage of the proceedings, plaintiff has failed to overcome the presumptive right of confidentiality accorded tax returns with a "`strong showing of overriding necessity'" ( Editel, N.Y. v. Liberty Studios, 162 A.D.2d 345, 346), including what the returns might prove and inability to obtain the information from any alternative source ( Consentino v. Schwartz, 155 A.D.2d 640, 641).

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman, Ross and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

Tullett and Tokyo Forex, Inc. v. Linker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 11, 1996
226 A.D.2d 182 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Tullett and Tokyo Forex, Inc. v. Linker

Case Details

Full title:TULLETT AND TOKYO FOREX, INC., Appellant, v. JACK LINKER, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 11, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 182 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
641 N.Y.S.2d 534

Citing Cases

Veloso v. Scaturro Bros.

"Right of confidentiality" connotes not merely that a piece of information is private in the ordinary sense,…

Rodriguez v. City of New York

Defendants' moved to strike plaintiff's claim for lost earnings for failing to provide authorizations for and…