From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tucker v. Buckman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 20, 2012
4:10-cv-00749-JTK (E.D. Ark. Dec. 20, 2012)

Opinion

4:10-cv-00749-JTK

12-20-2012

TROY ALLEN TUCKER PLAINTIFF v. JOSEPH BUCKMAN, et al. DEFENDANTS


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Memorandum and Order entered in this matter on this date, it is Considered, Ordered and Adjudged that this case be, and it is hereby, DISMISSED. The relief sought is denied.

As noted in the Memorandum and Order, Plaintiff's Constitutional claims against Defendants are Dismissed with prejudice, except the pain medication claim against Defendant Anderson, which is Dismissed without prejudice, for failure to exhaust. Plaintiff's state law claims are Dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of December, 2012.

________________________

JEROME T. KEARNEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Tucker v. Buckman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 20, 2012
4:10-cv-00749-JTK (E.D. Ark. Dec. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Tucker v. Buckman

Case Details

Full title:TROY ALLEN TUCKER PLAINTIFF v. JOSEPH BUCKMAN, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 20, 2012

Citations

4:10-cv-00749-JTK (E.D. Ark. Dec. 20, 2012)

Citing Cases

Raybourn v. Corizon Health, Inc.

927 F. Supp. 2d 708, 737, 740 (E.D.Mo. 2013). See also McMican v. Lewis, 53 F.3d 338 (9th Cir. 1995)…