Summary
concluding that "[p]roperty to be assessed, whatever may be its character, is to be taken and valued in the actual condition in which the owner holds it."
Summary of this case from Braemar at W. Milford, LLC v. W. Milford Twp.Opinion
Argued February 14, 1929 —
Decided May 20, 1929.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 105 N.J.L. 99.
For the appellant, Albert C. Wall.
For the respondents, Horace L. Allen.
This was an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court affirming the judgment or order of the state board of taxes and assessments brought to that tribunal for review on certiorari.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Black in the Supreme Court, except that we desire to add that the transcript discloses that there was evidence before the Supreme Court to justify its judgment. See Breitbart v. Lurich, 98 N.J.L. 556; Hand v. Howe, 1 N.J. Mis. R. 513; 104 N.J.L. 170.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.