From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trump v. Scott Exterminating Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 16, 1975
135 Ga. App. 473 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)

Opinion

50593.

ARGUED MAY 7, 1975.

DECIDED JULY 16, 1975.

Action for damages. Fulton Civil Court. Before Judge Wright.

Sexton Skidmore, J. Stephen Jenkins, for appellant.

J. Sam Plowden, for appellee.


Plaintiff brought this suit against Scott Exterminating Company, Inc., to recover for damages to her home resulting from termite infestation. In her complaint, plaintiff alleged that the defendant was negligent in inspecting said premises and fraudulently represented said premises to be free of termites. In its answer, the defendant set up various defenses and counterclaimed against plaintiff seeking a judgment for $1,500. After plaintiff had completed the presentation of her evidence, the defendant made a motion to dismiss plaintiff's action. The court, trying the case without a jury, granted defendant's motion. Plaintiff appeals from the order granting defendant's motion to dismiss. This appeal is brought without a certificate for immediate review as provided in Code Ann. § 6-701 (a) (2) (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; 1968, pp. 1072, 1073). Held:

Under the above circumstances the judgment above referred to is not final in that the cause is still pending in the Civil Court of Fulton County in the form of the defendant's counterclaim. Hence, the appeal is premature and this court is without jurisdiction to consider it. Conte Enterprises, Inc. v. Romax Const. Co., 128 Ga. App. 121 ( 195 S.E.2d 798).

Appeal dismissed. Quillian and Clark, JJ., concur.


ARGUED MAY 7, 1975 — DECIDED JULY 16, 1975.


Summaries of

Trump v. Scott Exterminating Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 16, 1975
135 Ga. App. 473 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)
Case details for

Trump v. Scott Exterminating Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TRUMP v. SCOTT EXTERMINATING COMPANY, INC

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jul 16, 1975

Citations

135 Ga. App. 473 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)
218 S.E.2d 149

Citing Cases

Thum v. White

Hence, the appeal is premature and this court is without jurisdiction to consider it. [Cit.]" Trump v. Scott…

Gulf Oil Co. v. Mantegna

As there was no final judgment in the case sub judice within the meaning of OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1) (formerly…