From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trumbower v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 23, 2003
849 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Summary

holding that defendant did not need to be present for resentencing when the only change required on remand was to remove a three-year mandatory minimum term

Summary of this case from Lamm v. State

Opinion

Case No. 2D02-1719.

Opinion filed July 23, 2003.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; R. Wallace Pack, Senior Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Allyn M. Giambalvo, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cerese Crawford Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Michael Warren Trumbower appeals his judgment and sentence for aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer. We affirm the conviction without comment. His ten-year sentence of imprisonment includes a three-year minimum mandatory term, which the trial court imposed over Mr. Trumbower's objection while Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA), review dismissed, 821 So.2d 302 (Fla. 2002), was still pending on rehearing in this court.

Based on Taylor and Green v. State, 839 So.2d 748 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), we reverse the minimum mandatory sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with the valid laws in effect at the time Mr. Trumbower committed his offense. As we did in Green, we certify conflict with Carlson v. State, 27 Fla. L. Weekly D2162 (Fla. 5th DCA Oct. 4, 2002), Lecorn v. State, 832 So.2d 818 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), and Jones v. State, 27 Fla. L. Weekly D2377 (Fla. 5th DCA Nov. 1, 2002), and we note possible conflict withNieves v. State, 833 So.2d 190 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), and Green v. State, 832 So.2d 199 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). We note that, due to a scrivener's error, the written sentence does not contain the three-year minimum mandatory term that was orally imposed by the trial court. If the trial court determines that Mr. Trumbower's ten-year sentence is lawful and that the only change required by this opinion is to remove the minimum mandatory term, Mr. Trumbower need not be present for resentencing.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded; conflict certified.

SILBERMAN and COVINGTON, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Trumbower v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 23, 2003
849 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

holding that defendant did not need to be present for resentencing when the only change required on remand was to remove a three-year mandatory minimum term

Summary of this case from Lamm v. State

directing that the defendant did not need to be present for resentencing when the only change required on remand was to remove a three-year mandatory minimum term that had been included in a ten-year sentence

Summary of this case from Escobedo v. State
Case details for

Trumbower v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL WARREN TRUMBOWER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jul 23, 2003

Citations

849 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Lamm v. State

Accordingly, we strike the three-year mandatory minimum portion of Lamm's sentence and direct that upon…

Escobedo v. State

We reverse in part and remand to the trial court only to strike the mandatory minimum term. Escobedo need not…