From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trujillo v. Tally

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Dec 9, 2011
461 F. App'x 561 (9th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 09-35192 D.C. No. 1:03-cv-00533-MHW

12-09-2011

ADELAIDO SAMUEL TRUJILLO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TALLY, Sergeant; PAYTON, Sergeant; COBB, Corrections Officer; ACREE, Corrections Officer; EARL CALLAHAN, Defendants - Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho

Mikel H. Williams, Magistrate Judge, Presiding


Submitted August 9, 2011

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
--------

San Francisco, California

Before: HUG, SKOPIL, and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.

Adelaido Trujillo appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. The facts of this case are known to the parties. We need not repeat them here.

Trujillo may not seek review of the district court's denial of his motion for summary judgment on the inadequate medical care claim. The Supreme Court recently clarified that a party may not appeal an order denying summary judgment after a full trial on the merits. Ortiz v. Jordan, ___ U.S. ___, 131 S. Ct. 884, 888-89 (2011); see also Price v. Kramer, 200 F.3d 1237, 1243 (9th Cir. 2000).

The district court was correct to grant summary judgment to the IDOC defendants on Trujillo's calculated harassment and failure to protect claims. Trujillo's failure to protect claim is based on nothing but his own speculation, and "this court has refused to find a genuine issue where the only evidence presented is uncorroborated and self-serving testimony." Villiarimo v. Aloha Island Air, Inc., 281 F.3d 1054, 1061 (9th Cir. 2002) (internal quotation marks omitted). Appellant's calculated harassment allegations simply do not rise to the level of an Eighth Amendment violation. See Hope v. Pelzer, 536 U.S. 730, 737-38 (2002).

We have reviewed Trujillo's remaining contentions, and determine that they lack merit.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Trujillo v. Tally

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Dec 9, 2011
461 F. App'x 561 (9th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Trujillo v. Tally

Case Details

Full title:ADELAIDO SAMUEL TRUJILLO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TALLY, Sergeant…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 9, 2011

Citations

461 F. App'x 561 (9th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

Washington v. United Parcel Serv.

She cannot proceed “based on nothing but [her] own speculation, and ‘this court has refuse[s] to find a…

Ahdom v. Cate

See Hope v. Pelzer, 536 U.S. 730, 737-38 (2002)." See Trujillo v. Tally, 2011 WL 6122583, No. 09-35192 (9th…