From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Truex v. Allstate Insurance Company

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jan 26, 2006
Misc. No. 05-0439 (ESH) (D.D.C. Jan. 26, 2006)

Opinion

Misc. No. 05-0439 (ESH).

January 26, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS


Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.3, this Court referred this matter to Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola for report and recommendation. Magistrate Judge Facciola issued a report and recommendation on January 10, 2006.

Under Local Civil Rule 72.3(b), parties may file objections within ten days of service of a magistrate judge's report. A party's failure to file an objection within that ten days may waive appellate review of a District Court order adopting the report and recommendation. See LCvR 72.3(b).

In this case, the Court concurs with the recommendations contained in the magistrate judge's report. Since no party has filed any objections within the prescribed ten-day period, it is this 26th day of January, 2006, hereby

ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED IN FULL; it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff's Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition [# 9] is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Truex v. Allstate Insurance Company

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jan 26, 2006
Misc. No. 05-0439 (ESH) (D.D.C. Jan. 26, 2006)
Case details for

Truex v. Allstate Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:DONALD L. TRUEX, D.D.S., Plaintiff, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY and DOES…

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Jan 26, 2006

Citations

Misc. No. 05-0439 (ESH) (D.D.C. Jan. 26, 2006)

Citing Cases

Reverse Mortg. Sols., Inc. v. Kennedy

See 39 C.F.R. § 265.13. Congress allowed federal agencies to establish these types of regulations pursuant to…

In re Vioxx Products Liability Litigation

Since Linder, several district courts using the Linderdicta have found that " person" as used in Rule 45 does…