From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trovillo v. Florida Dept. of Law

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 28, 2000
762 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

Case No. 5D99-3598

Opinion Filed July 28, 2000 JULY TERM 2000

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Gene R. Stephenson, Judge.

Ryan Thomas Truskoski, of Jaeger Blankner, Orlando, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Charlie McCoy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Appellant, Frank Trovillo ["Trovillo"], appeals the lower court's denial of his petition for writ of mandamus. The trial court did not err by the denial of Trovillo's petition for mandamus, which sought to establish that the registration and notification laws applicable to sexual predators and sexual offenders could not be applied to Trovillo, who had committed the offense of attempted lewd and lascivious assault prior to the effective date of any of the statutes. See § 775.21 and 943.0435, Fla. Stat. (1997). Trovillo did not allege any facts establishing that the respondents have any clear, legal ministerial duty to perform. To the contrary, the respondents are following the dictates of legislation. Mandamus is not the vehicle to litigate whether the statute is unconstitutional. Furthermore, Trovillo failed to allege facts establishing a clear legal right to the requested relief. Mandamus is not appropriate.

Mr. Trovillo may be able to state claims for injunctive and/or declaratory relief; however, we cannot find that Trovillo has made any request to amend his pleading.

AFFIRMED.

HARRIS and PETERSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Trovillo v. Florida Dept. of Law

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 28, 2000
762 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Trovillo v. Florida Dept. of Law

Case Details

Full title:FRANK L. TROVILLO, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, ET…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jul 28, 2000

Citations

762 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Szuch v. State

The order denying appellant's post-conviction "Motion for Clarification of Applicability of 775.21" is hereby…

Roth v. State

The order denying appellant's post-conviction motion is hereby affirmed, without prejudice to his ability to…