From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tron v. Sinclair Refining Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1930
155 S.E. 924 (N.C. 1930)

Opinion

(Filed 3 December, 1930.)

APPEAL by defendant, Sinclair Refining Company, from Shaw, J., at August Term, 1930, of BURKE.

J. Francis Tron, Jr., S. J. Ervin and S. J. Ervin, Jr., for plaintiff.

C.H. Gover for defendant, Sinclair Refining Company.


Civil action for wrongful death brought against Sinclair Refining Company, a corporation chartered under the laws of the State of Maine, and B. D. Williams and R. A. Self, citizens and residents of Catawba County, N.C.

Motion by nonresident, corporate defendant, to remove cause to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of North Carolina for trial. Motion denied, and movant appeals.


The petition for removal, besides showing the presence of the requisite jurisdictional amount, asserts a right of removal on the ground of diverse citizenship, and alleges that the resident defendants have been fraudulently joined to prevent such removal.

No new question of law is presented by the appeal. The trial court held that the case was controlled by the line of decisions of which Givens v. Mfg. Co., 196 N.C. 377, 145 S.E. 681, and Crisp v. Fibre Co., 193 N.C. 77, 136 S.E. 238, may be cited as fairly illustrative, while the appellant contends that the principles announced in Cox v. Lumber Co., 193 N.C. 28, 136 S.E. 254; Johnson v. Lumber Co., 189 N.C. 81, 126 S.E. 165, and Rea v. Mirror Co., 158 N.C. 24, 73 S.E. 116, are more nearly applicable. No error in the ruling of the trial court has been shown.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Tron v. Sinclair Refining Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1930
155 S.E. 924 (N.C. 1930)
Case details for

Tron v. Sinclair Refining Co.

Case Details

Full title:J. FRANCIS TRON, JR., ADMINISTRATOR, v. SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 1, 1930

Citations

155 S.E. 924 (N.C. 1930)
155 S.E. 924

Citing Cases

Wright v. Lumber Co.

The Bemis Lumber Company, a nonresident corporation defendant, duly filed its petition and bond for removal…