From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Triangle Transp., Inc. v. Markel Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 5, 2005
18 A.D.3d 229 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

6021N.

May 5, 2005.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Edmead, J.), entered October 29, 2004, which granted defendant's motion to vacate the default judgment entered against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Buckley, P.J., Saxe, Nardelli, Williams and Catterson, JJ., concur.


It is not contested that defendant insurer has a meritorious defense to this action by its insured alleging wrongful disclaimer. Moreover, defendant has satisfactorily shown a reasonable excuse for its failure to answer the complaint by adducing evidence, in admissible form, demonstrating that although it duly forwarded plaintiff's pleadings to its claims administrator, the pleadings were inadvertently mislaid or incorrectly filed and accordingly never assigned to counsel for handling. Defendant was unaware that the action had gone undefended until it received a notice of execution on the judgment. The requirements for vacatur of the default judgment having thus been met, defendant's motion was properly granted ( see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; 2005; Burgos v. Allcity Ins. Co., 272 AD2d 195).


Summaries of

Triangle Transp., Inc. v. Markel Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 5, 2005
18 A.D.3d 229 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Triangle Transp., Inc. v. Markel Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:TRIANGLE TRANSPORT, INC., Appellant, v. MARKEL INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 5, 2005

Citations

18 A.D.3d 229 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
794 N.Y.S.2d 363

Citing Cases

Kleinberg Elec. v. Travelers Casu. Surety

Discussion A party seeking to vacate a default judgment must demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for its…

W. 125th St. Realty v. Chosen Realty Corp.

The Abstractor argues that it has a reasonable excuse for its delay because (i) although the Third-Party…