From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tri-Con, Inc. v. Volvo Trucks North America, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Jan 14, 2009
1:06CV577 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 14, 2009)

Opinion

1:06CV577.

January 14, 2009


ORDER


The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on November 5, 2008, was served on the parties in this action. No objections were filed within the time limits prescribed by § 636.

The court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's motion for sanctions [Docket No. 89] against Plaintiffs' counsel pursuant to Rule 11 or 28 U.S.C. § 1927 be DENIED and that the request of Plaintiffs' counsel for costs be DENIED. Defendant's motion for Rule 37 sanctions remains pending before the Court.


Summaries of

Tri-Con, Inc. v. Volvo Trucks North America, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Jan 14, 2009
1:06CV577 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 14, 2009)
Case details for

Tri-Con, Inc. v. Volvo Trucks North America, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TRI-CON, INC., MICHAEL MERRICK, GERALD PIZZINI, DOUGLAS FABISH, FRANK…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Jan 14, 2009

Citations

1:06CV577 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 14, 2009)

Citing Cases

South Carolina v. United States

TDC–14–3678, 2016 WL 865364, at *6 (D. Md. March 7, 2016) ; Wood v. Gen. Dynamics Corp. , 157 F.Supp.3d 428,…