Opinion
January 24, 2008.
Insurance — Disclaimer of Coverage — Thirty-day delay in disclaiming coverage was unreasonable where sole ground was late notice of claim.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Transcontinental v. Gold
Supreme Court of the State of New York. Nassau County
Jan 24, 2008
18 Misc. 3d 1135 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2008)
Summaries of
Transcontinental v. Gold
Supreme Court of the State of New York. Nassau County
Jan 24, 2008
18 Misc. 3d 1135 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2008)
Case details for
Transcontinental v. Gold
Case Details
Full title:Transcontinental Ins. Co. v. Gold
Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York. Nassau County
Date published: Jan 24, 2008
Citations
18 Misc. 3d 1135 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 50322
859 N.Y.S.2d 899
Citing Cases
Zevrone Realty Corp. v. Marine General Ins.
Thereupon, this Court finds that Federal's delay in providing its disclaimer to Plaintiff — measured from…
Able Health Care Service v. Ace American Insur.In contrast, the primary reason for ACE's disclaimer was readily apparent upon receipt of notice of the loss…