From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Transamerica Insurance Company v. Hardin

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth
Feb 28, 1969
437 S.W.2d 443 (Tex. Civ. App. 1969)

Opinion

No. 16988.

January 31, 1969. Rehearing Denied February 28, 1969.

Appeal from the District Court, Denton County, W.C. Boyd, J.

Lancaster Smith and Harvey L. Davis, Dallas, for appellant, Transamerica Ins. Co., and its party in privity, Don A. Loftis, d/b/a Don A. Loftis Const. Co.

Strasburger, Price, Kelton, Martin Unis, and Royal H. Brin, Jr., Dallas, for appellees, Don A. Loftis, d/b/a Don A. Loftis Const. Co., Loftis Faulk Const. Co., Lawrence R. McCullough and Dick N. Richards.

Jack Barton and William P. Philips, Jr., Denton, for appellee City of Denton, Texas.

George R. Edwards, Dallas, Jack Gray, Denton, Robert Guinn, Dallas, for appellee Billy Joe Hardin (no brief filed in this court).


OPINION


This is an appeal brought for the purpose of reforming and correcting certain recitals alleged to be false and incorrect contained in a judgment which was agreed upon and approved as to both form and substance by all parties of record in the court below and which judgment has been voluntarily satisfied or complied with by such parties.

Since the appeal is before us without any assignment by any of the parties of record in the court below complaining of any error on the part of the trial court and there being no fundamental error apparent or record the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Transamerica Insurance Company v. Hardin

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth
Feb 28, 1969
437 S.W.2d 443 (Tex. Civ. App. 1969)
Case details for

Transamerica Insurance Company v. Hardin

Case Details

Full title:TRANSAMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. Billy Joe HARDIN et…

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth

Date published: Feb 28, 1969

Citations

437 S.W.2d 443 (Tex. Civ. App. 1969)

Citing Cases

Daniell Motor v. Northwest Bank

No error of the trial court was even alleged by Northwest, so this part of the judgment stands. See…