From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tran v. Nowak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 1997
245 A.D.2d 1083 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

December 31, 1997

Present — Denman, P.J., Lawton, Wisner, Balio and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted, and complaint and cross claims against defendants Min Xu and Genchuan Xu dismissed. Memorandum: These actions stem from a motor vehicle accident on June 7, 1995 in the Town of Cheektowaga. At the time of the accident, defendant Min Xu was operating an automobile owned by her father, defendant Genchuan Xu. It is uncontroverted that Min Xu was driving at a legal rate of speed in the proper lane of travel when an automobile operated by defendant Shelly L. Nowak approached from the opposite direction, crossed a double yellow line and struck Min Xu's automobile, causing the death of Anne Oanh Tran, a passenger in Min Xu's automobile. Nowak was convicted of crossing a solid yellow line of traffic in violation of Vehicle and traffic Law § 1126 (a). The representatives of Tran's estate commenced this action against Min Xu, Genchuan Xu, Nowak and other defendants.

Supreme Court erred in denying the motion of Min Xu and Genchuan Xu (defendants) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims against them. Once defendants established that the head-on collision was caused by Nowak's crossing over into Min Xu's lane of travel, defendants "established `a complete defense to [the] action'" (Gouchie v. Gill, 198 A.D.2d 862). In opposition to the motion for summary judgment, neither plaintiffs nor the other defendants raised an issue of fact regarding the negligence of Min Xu but, rather, merely speculated that she might have done something to avoid the accident. Such speculation is insufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment ( see, Davis v. Pimm, 228 A.D.2d 885, 887-888, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 815; Kozak v. Hyjek, 221 A.D.2d 999; Gouchie v. Gill, supra, at 863). In light of our determination, we do not consider defendants' remaining contention. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J. — Summary Judgment.)


Summaries of

Tran v. Nowak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 1997
245 A.D.2d 1083 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Tran v. Nowak

Case Details

Full title:GINA M. TRAN et al., Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 31, 1997

Citations

245 A.D.2d 1083 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
666 N.Y.S.2d 84

Citing Cases

Whitfield v. Toense

Defendants contend that there is an issue of fact concerning plaintiff's comparative fault that precludes…

Schager v. Lino Bordi, Inc.

The plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability was properly denied. Issues of fact…