From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trala v. U.S.

U.S.
Jan 9, 2006
546 U.S. 1086 (2006)

Summary

finding no Confrontation Clause violation where out-of-court statements were not introduced for their truth

Summary of this case from Boretsky v. Ricci

Opinion

No. 05-7628.

January 9, 2006.


Certiorari Granted — Vacated and Remanded

C.A. 3d Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U. S. 220 (2005). Reported below: 386 F. 3d 536.


Summaries of

Trala v. U.S.

U.S.
Jan 9, 2006
546 U.S. 1086 (2006)

finding no Confrontation Clause violation where out-of-court statements were not introduced for their truth

Summary of this case from Boretsky v. Ricci
Case details for

Trala v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:TRALA v. UNITED STATES

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 9, 2006

Citations

546 U.S. 1086 (2006)

Citing Cases

United States v. Wrensford

There is little doubt that [PCR/STR DNA typing] has a testable hypothesis. 'The hypothesis of PCR/STR DNA…

United States v. Humbert

The Third Circuit has addressed this very issue and has ruled that the PCR/STR DNA test meets "the standards…