From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trainer v. City of Covington

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 11, 1964
138 S.E.2d 170 (Ga. 1964)

Opinion

22564.

ARGUED JULY 13, 1964.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 11, 1964.

Appellate procedure. Newton Superior Court. Before Judge Guess.

Ballard Thigpen, Troy R. Thigpen, Jr., for plaintiffs in error.

Greeley Ellis, Reuben M. Tuck, contra.


Where, as here, the sole ground giving this court jurisdiction is the prayer seeking to enjoin the performance of a contract, and it appearing from oral statements of counsel made in oral argument before this court that the contract has been fully performed, the question of injunction is moot, and this court is without jurisdiction. Pickett v. Georgia, Fla. c. R. Co., 214 Ga. 263 ( 104 S.E.2d 450); Lorenz v. DeKalb County, 215 Ga. 731 ( 113 S.E.2d 450); Espey v. Village of North Atlanta, 218 Ga. 429 ( 128 S.E.2d 489); Woods v. State of Ga., 219 Ga. 503 ( 133 S.E.2d 865); Douglas-Guardian Warehouse Corp. v. Todd, 212 Ga. 791 ( 96 S.E.2d 275).

Transferred to the Court of Appeals. All the Justices concur.

ARGUED JULY 13, 1964 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 11, 1964.


Summaries of

Trainer v. City of Covington

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 11, 1964
138 S.E.2d 170 (Ga. 1964)
Case details for

Trainer v. City of Covington

Case Details

Full title:TRAINER et al. v. CITY OF COVINGTON et al

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Sep 11, 1964

Citations

138 S.E.2d 170 (Ga. 1964)
138 S.E.2d 170

Citing Cases

Williams v. Shaffer

" As held in Griffin v. Grantham, 220 Ga. 474 ( 139 S.E.2d 398): "since all that was sought to be enjoined…

Trainer v. City of Covington

The Supreme Court held the question of injunction to be moot because the contract had been fully performed…