From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

TPZ Corp. v. Rigakos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 8, 1996
226 A.D.2d 445 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 8, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Amann, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants' unsubstantiated, conclusory allegations of lack of consideration and fraud in the inducement were insufficient to defeat the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint ( see, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557; Germano v. Friedman, 221 A.D.2d 501). We have reviewed the defendants' remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Sullivan, J.P., Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

TPZ Corp. v. Rigakos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 8, 1996
226 A.D.2d 445 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

TPZ Corp. v. Rigakos

Case Details

Full title:TPZ CORPORATION, Respondent, v. ELIAS C. RIGAKOS et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 8, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 445 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
640 N.Y.S.2d 803

Citing Cases

TPZ Corp. v. Rigakos

Decided January 14, 1997 Appeal from (2d Dept: 226 A.D.2d 445) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL GRANTED OR…

Tonche v. Cohen

Further, the court notes that, for more than two years after executing the note, defendants made regular…