From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Town of Oyster Bay v. J.D. Posillico, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 24, 2012
94 A.D.3d 1093 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-04-24

TOWN OF OYSTER BAY, appellant, v. J.D. POSILLICO, INC., et al., respondents.

Carman, Callahan & Ingham, LLP, Farmingdale, N.Y. (Michael F. Ingham of counsel), for appellant. Agovino & Asselta, LLP, Mineola, N.Y. (Joseph P. Asselta and John M. Comiskey of counsel), for respondent J.D. Posillico, Inc.


Carman, Callahan & Ingham, LLP, Farmingdale, N.Y. (Michael F. Ingham of counsel), for appellant. Agovino & Asselta, LLP, Mineola, N.Y. (Joseph P. Asselta and John M. Comiskey of counsel), for respondent J.D. Posillico, Inc.

Devitt Spellman Barrett, LLP, Smithtown, N.Y. (John M. Denby of counsel), for respondent Lizza Industries, Inc.

*807 In an action to recover damages for continuing public nuisance, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.), entered January 5, 2011, as (1), upon renewal, in effect, vacated so much of its prior order entered April 9, 2010, as denied that branch of the motion of the defendant J.D. Posillico, Inc., which was pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it as time-barred, and thereupon granted that branch of the motion, and (2) granted the separate motion of the defendant Lizza Industries, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it as time-barred.

ORDERED that the order entered January 5, 2011, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

The plaintiff alleges that, pursuant to a contract with Nassau County, the defendants completed certain sewer construction work in 1978, and that defects in the construction work constitute and contribute to a continuing public nuisance. The action is time-barred for the reasons stated in the companion case of Village of Lindenhurst v. J.D. Posillico, Inc., 94 A.D.3d 1101, –––N.Y.S.2d ––––, 2012 WL 1415133 [decided herewith].

The plaintiff's contentions relating to alleged statutory violations are not properly before this Court.

RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, ANGIOLILLO and LEVENTHAL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Town of Oyster Bay v. J.D. Posillico, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 24, 2012
94 A.D.3d 1093 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Town of Oyster Bay v. J.D. Posillico, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TOWN OF OYSTER BAY, appellant, v. J.D. POSILLICO, INC., et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 24, 2012

Citations

94 A.D.3d 1093 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 3169
942 N.Y.S.2d 806

Citing Cases

Town of Oyster Bay v. Lizza Indus., Inc.

The court also rejected the Village's argument that "the conduct giving rise to the alleged nuisance is…

Town of Oyster Bay v. Lizza Indus., Inc.

The Appellate Division held that the other nine actions were “time-barred for the reasons stated” in Village…