From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Town of Huntington v. Town of Oyster Bay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 20, 1976
55 A.D.2d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

December 20, 1976


In an action, inter alia, to enjoin the construction of a solid waste disposal facility, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 17, 1976, which granted defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a]). Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and motion denied. The time within which defendant may serve its responsive pleading is extended until 10 days after service of notice of entry of the order to be made hereon pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [f]). The complaint is sufficient on its face (see New York Trap Rock Corp. v Town of Clarkstown, 299 N.Y. 77). A motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a]) may be considered by the court as a motion for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [c]) only after adequate notice to the parties. As the record reveals no such notice to the plaintiff, reversal is mandated by Rovello v Orofino Realty Co. ( 40 N.Y.2d 633). Hopkins, Acting P.J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Rabin and Titone, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Town of Huntington v. Town of Oyster Bay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 20, 1976
55 A.D.2d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Town of Huntington v. Town of Oyster Bay

Case Details

Full title:TOWN OF HUNTINGTON, Appellant, v. TOWN OF OYSTER BAY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 20, 1976

Citations

55 A.D.2d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Vim Construction Co. v. Board of Assessors

We take judicial notice of the fact that a suit by residents and businesses in the area to enjoin the…