From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Town of Hempstead v. Demasco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 2009
62 A.D.3d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-01051.

May 5, 2009.

In an action to permanently enjoin the defendants from operating a junkyard or scrap metal business, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Galasso, J.), entered September 10, 2008, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the defendants and against it denying a permanent injunction.

Joseph J. Ra, Town Attorney, Hempstead, N.Y. (William J. Muller III of counsel), for appellant.

Richard L. Gumo, Delhi, N.Y., for respondents.

Fisher, J.P., Miller, Chambers and Austin, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Upon review of a determination rendered after a nonjury trial, this Court's authority "is as broad as that of the trial court," and this Court may "render the judgment it finds warranted by the facts, taking into account in a close case the fact that the trial judge had the advantage of seeing the witnesses" ( Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc., v Town of Bedford, 60 NY2d 492, 499). We discern no basis to disturb the Supreme Court's determination.

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Town of Hempstead v. Demasco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 2009
62 A.D.3d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Town of Hempstead v. Demasco

Case Details

Full title:TOWN OF HEMPSTEAD, Appellant, v. JOSEPH DEMASCO et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 5, 2009

Citations

62 A.D.3d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 3715
877 N.Y.S.2d 700

Citing Cases

Lerner v. Ayervais

We reverse. "In reviewing a determination made after a nonjury trial, the power of this Court is as broad as…