From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Town of Greenburgh v. Buser

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 25, 1955
285 App. Div. 1090 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)

Opinion

April 25, 1955.

Present — Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Murphy, JJ; Nolan, P.J., not voting.


Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts. Judgment is unanimously directed for plaintiff, with costs, declaring that the building permit and certificate of occupancy were illegally issued to defendant Buser in that the plans and specifications and the building erected in accordance therewith do not conform to the provisions of the plaintiff's building zone ordinance, as amended, and the conditions imposed by the town board in granting the application of defendant Buser for a change of zone. Defendants are enjoined from constructing, maintaining, using or occupying the present building, or any building on the premises, until such building conforms to the provisions of the zoning ordinance and the resolution of the town board adopted July 7, 1953, and a proper building permit and certificate of occupancy are duly issued. The facts clearly show violations of the ordinance and resolution in the plans and construction of the present building. The permit and certificate, therefore, are revocable. There is no present need to determine whether the existing disputed uses of parts of the present building constitute a violation of the zoning ordinance.


Summaries of

Town of Greenburgh v. Buser

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 25, 1955
285 App. Div. 1090 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)
Case details for

Town of Greenburgh v. Buser

Case Details

Full title:TOWN OF GREENBURGH, Plaintiff, v. BERT F. BUSER et al., Defendants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 25, 1955

Citations

285 App. Div. 1090 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)

Citing Cases

Slevin v. L.I. Jewish Med. Center

It is clear that an action may be maintained by a municipality itself to enjoin a violation of its zoning…

People v. Hacker

RENEWAL PERMIT AND NONCONFORMING USES It was established at the trial that, pursuant to section 68-420.1 of…