Opinion
September 29, 1997
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for the entry of a judgment declaring that the letter agreement between the parties dated May 9, 1995, and the arbitration clause contained therein, is in effect.
In the instant action, the plaintiff Town of Babylon (hereinafter the Town) alleged, inter alia, that a letter agreement between the parties dated May 9, 1995, which was executed by a Deputy Town Attorney and contained a broad arbitration clause, was of no legal effect in view of the Town Board's failure to authorize this agreement by resolution, pursuant to Town Law § 64 (6). We disagree.
On June 6, 1995, the Town Board duly passed Resolution No. 462 authorizing the Town Supervisor and Comptroller to execute, inter alia, Change Order No. 16, which made reference to the letter agreement dated May 9, 1995. In accordance with Resolution No. 462, Change Order No. 16 was signed by the Town Supervisor and Comptroller on the next day, June 7, 1995.
Under these circumstances, the Town Board's Resolution No. 462 constituted a ratification of the letter agreement dated May 9, 1995, and thus the Town was bound by the arbitration clause contained therein ( see generally, Seif v. City of Long Beach, 286 N.Y. 382, 386-387; Matter of Huntington TV Cable Corp. v. State of New York Commn. on Cable Tel., 61 N.Y.2d 926).
We note that since this is a declaratory judgment action, the Supreme Court should have directed the entry of a declaration in favor of the defendant ( see, Lanza v. Wagner, 11 N.Y.2d 317, 334, appeal dismissed 371 U.S. 74, cert denied 371 U.S. 901).
Mangano, P.J., Copertino, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.