Opinion
Eric S. Vail, City Attorney (SBN 160333) CITY OF HEMET, Ronald F. Frank, (SBN 109076) Amy E. Hoyt, (SBN 149789) BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP, Riverside, CA, Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF HEMET.
AMENDED JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT CITY OF HEMET STATING AMOUNT OF COSTS TAXED AGAINST PLAINTIFF
GEORGE H. WU, District Judge.
On February 17, 2011, the court entered judgment in Defendant City of Hemet's ("City") favor and ordered Plaintiff Howard Tounget ("Plaintiff") to pay the City's costs. A true and correct copy of the Notice of Entry of Judgment, filed on February 22, 2011, is attached as Exhibit A.
On March 7, 2011, the district court ordered costs taxed against Plaintiff in the amount of $8, 445.44. A true and correct copy of the Bill of Costs is attached as Exhibit B.
Plaintiff appealed. On May 22, 2013, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its Memorandum Opinion affirming judgment in the City's favor and ordering Plaintiff to pay the City's costs. A true and correct copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion is attached as Exhibit C.
On June 14, 2013, the Court of Appeals issued its Mandate and taxed costs against Plaintiff in the amount of $315.00. A true and correct copy of the Mandate is attached as Exhibit D.
Based on the foregoing, the Judgment entered on February 7, 2011 is hereby amended to tax costs against Plaintiff in the amount of $8, 760.44. Plaintiff is ordered to pay the City costs in the amount of $8, 760.44.
IT IS SO ORDERED.