From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toulson v. Young Han Pae

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 22, 2004
6 A.D.3d 292 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

3111.

Decided April 22, 2004.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dianne T. Renwick, J.), entered June 16, 2003, which denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted and the matter remanded for further proceedings.

Law Office of Robert P. Tusa, Esq., Yonkers (David Holmes of counsel), for appellant.

Before: Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Ellerin, Friedman, JJ.


Defendants' failure to rebut the presumption of defendant Lazaro's negligence created by his rear-end collision with plaintiff's stopped vehicle entitles plaintiff to summary judgment on liability ( see Burns v. Gonzalez, 307 A.D.2d 863, 865). In view of defendant's admission that plaintiff's vehicle was stopped before he rear-ended it, his claim that she failed to timely activate her turn signal does not raise an issue of fact as to the cause of the collision ( id.).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Toulson v. Young Han Pae

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 22, 2004
6 A.D.3d 292 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Toulson v. Young Han Pae

Case Details

Full title:KIMBERLY TOULSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, CYNTHIA WADE, ET AL., Plaintiffs…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 22, 2004

Citations

6 A.D.3d 292 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
774 N.Y.S.2d 706

Citing Cases

Valera v. Ramos

The failure of an opposing party to rebut the presumption of negligence will entitle the moving party to…

Valera v. Ramos

The failure of an opposing party to rebut the presumption of negligence will entitle the moving party to…