From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Torrez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 25, 1958
320 S.W.2d 817 (Tex. Crim. App. 1958)

Opinion


320 S.W.2d 817 (Tex.Crim.App. 1958) Angel TORREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 29947. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. June 25, 1958

John J. Herrera, Houston, for appellant.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Thomas D. White, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, and Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

The offense is misdemeanor embezzlement; the punishment, 5 days in jail and $25 fine.

The conviction was had during the December term of the County Court at Law No. 3, of Harris County, which began December 2, 1957, and expired February 1, 1958.

Judgment was rendered and entered on January 9, 1958. Appellant's original motion for a new trial was filed January 9, 1958, and it was not amended.

No action was taken by the trial court on the original motion for a new trial within twenty days after it was filed. Therefore, it was overruled by operation of law within the term in which the judgment of conviction was rendered. Art. 755, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P. Mahan v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 288 S.W.2d [167 Tex.Crim. 26] 508; De Hay v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 294 S.W.2d 401. No notice of appeal was given at the December term, 1957, of said court. Therefore, the judgment became final upon the expiration of the December term. Notice of appeal during said term was requisite in order to confer jurisdiction of the appeal upon this court. Art. 827, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P. Woodward v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 295 S.W.2d 659.

The appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.


Summaries of

Torrez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 25, 1958
320 S.W.2d 817 (Tex. Crim. App. 1958)
Case details for

Torrez v. State

Case Details

Full title:Angel TORREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jun 25, 1958

Citations

320 S.W.2d 817 (Tex. Crim. App. 1958)

Citing Cases

State v. Moore

, "[t]he untimely filing of a motion for new trial prevents consideration of that motion."); Robinson v.…

Grimes v. State

Instead of preparing a bystanders' bill, as is required by Article 760d, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P., as amended in…