From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Torres v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 20, 2002
830 So. 2d 917 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 4D02-2337

Decision filed November 20, 2002

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Richard I. Wennet, Judge; L.T. Nos. 00-5157 CFA02 99-10005 CFA02.

Tina Torres, Ft. Lauderdale, pro se.

Richard E. Doran, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine M. Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


The defendant appeals an order denying her rule 3.800(a) motion. The trial court did not attach those parts of the record in the case that refute the defendant's claim. See Ford v. State, 667 So.2d 455 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). The state concedes that such attachments should have been made. We reverse and remand for the trial court to attach the portions of the record refuting the claim pursuant to our ruling in Ford.

FARMER, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

NOT FINAL UNTIL THE DISPOSITION OF ANY TIMELY FILED MOTION FOR REHEARING.


Summaries of

Torres v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 20, 2002
830 So. 2d 917 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Torres v. State

Case Details

Full title:TINA TORRES, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 20, 2002

Citations

830 So. 2d 917 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Martone v. State

The trial court failed to attach portions of the record conclusively refuting appellant's legally sufficient…