719 So. 2d 947 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toro v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Oct 1, 1998

719 So. 2d 947 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Summary

holding that the motion must contain allegations where in the record information supporting the claim of jail credit can be located and explain how the record demonstrates entitlement to the relief requested

Summary of this case from Walden v. State

See 8 Summaries

Opinion

No. 98-2378.

October 1, 1998.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Paul L. Backman, J.

William J. Toro, DeFuniak Springs, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sarah B. Mayer, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of William Toro's Motion to Correct Sentence, in which he sought additional jail credit. Such motions must be filed within 30 days of sentencing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.800(b)(1998). Toro missed that deadline by a matter of years.

Affirmance is without prejudice to Toro to file a rule 3.800(a) motion in the trial court. After Toro filed his rule 3.800(b) motion, the Florida Supreme Court decided State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla. 1998). Mancino held that an error in the trial court's award for jail credit can be raised at any time in a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) "when it is affirmatively alleged that the trial court records demonstrate on their face an entitlement to relief." Id. at S303. The First District has explained that a mere conclusory allegation that the answer lies in the record will not meet the new pleading requirements. Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). We also adopt the requirement that at a minimum, the motion will have to allege where in the record the information can be located and explain how the record demonstrates entitlement to the relief requested.

STONE, C.J., and GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Summaries of

Toro v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Oct 1, 1998

719 So. 2d 947 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Summary of this case from Walden v. State

holding that with regards to jail credit claims, `at a minimum, the motion will have to allege where in the record the information can be located and explain how the record demonstrates entitlement to the relief requested.'

Summary of this case from Petscher v. State

holding that with regards to jail credit claims, "at a minimum, the motion will have to allege where in the record the information can be located and explain how the record demonstrates entitlement to the relief requested."

Summary of this case from Trapkin v. State

adopting requirement that rule 3.800 motion for jail time credit "will have to allege where in the record the information can be located and explain how the record demonstrates entitlement to the relief requested."

Summary of this case from Cabrera v. State

adopting strict pleading requirement imposed by Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)

Summary of this case from Wallace v. State

affirming denial of Rule 3.800 motion without prejudice to file a new motion alleging "where in the record the information can be located and explain[ing] how the record demonstrates entitlement to the relief requested"

Summary of this case from Bridges v. State

Summary of this case from Daily v. State

requiring 3.800 movant to identify where in the record the information can be located and explain how the record demonstrates entitlement to the relief requested

Summary of this case from Fenelon v. State

Toro v. State

Summary

Opinion

Toro v. State

Toro v. State

Case Details

Citations

Citing Cases

Toro v. State

Summary

Opinion

Toro v. State

Toro v. State

Case Details

CitationsCopy Citation

Citing Cases

Citations