From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toro v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 21, 2001
284 A.D.2d 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Decided and Entered: June 21, 2001.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Juan Toro, Cape Vincent, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Wayne L. Benjamin of counsel), Albany, for respondents.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Spain and Rose, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit the unauthorized use of a controlled substance, harassment, threats and refusing to obey a direct order. He challenges the determination of his guilt on the ground that it was not based on substantial evidence. We disagree. Evidence presented at the disciplinary hearing included two misbehavior reports, the positive results of two urinalysis tests, the testimony of a facility employee who had witnessed the charged acts of misconduct and the testimony of a representative of the manufacturer of the urinalysis apparatus used at the facility, who opined that none of the medications being taken by petitioner at the time the tests were conducted could possibly have produced a false positive urinalysis test result. We find this sufficient to constitute substantial evidence supporting the determination of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Mason v. Goord, 251 A.D.2d 829, 830;Matter of Murphy v. Selsky, 239 A.D.2d 724, 725). Petitioner's contention that he has a hearing impairment that disabled him from participating in his defense is belied by the hearing transcript wherein it is apparent that petitioner understood the statements made by the participants and was able to respond by mounting a vigorous defense on his own behalf (see, Matter of Moore v. Selsky, 264 A.D.2d 923, 924).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Spain and Rose, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Toro v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 21, 2001
284 A.D.2d 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Toro v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JUAN TORO, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as Commissioner…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 21, 2001

Citations

284 A.D.2d 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
726 N.Y.S.2d 780

Citing Cases

Medina v. Prack

To the contrary, the Hearing Officer assisted him by reading the misbehavior reports repeatedly, as well as…

In the Matter of Ramos v. Selsky

The record discloses that the Hearing Officer adjourned the hearing to investigate petitioner's request and…