From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tornado Bus Co. v. Bus & Coach Am. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Dec 23, 2014
No. 3:14-CV-3231-M (N.D. Tex. Dec. 23, 2014)

Opinion

No. 3:14-CV-3231-M

12-23-2014

TORNADO BUS COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. BUS & COACH AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated November 21, 2014, the Court finds that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted. The deposition of Defendant Brennan will not be permitted on jurisdictional facts.

SO ORDERED this 23rd day of December, 2014.

/s/_________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS


Summaries of

Tornado Bus Co. v. Bus & Coach Am. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Dec 23, 2014
No. 3:14-CV-3231-M (N.D. Tex. Dec. 23, 2014)
Case details for

Tornado Bus Co. v. Bus & Coach Am. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:TORNADO BUS COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. BUS & COACH AMERICA CORPORATION, ET…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Dec 23, 2014

Citations

No. 3:14-CV-3231-M (N.D. Tex. Dec. 23, 2014)

Citing Cases

Cunningham v. CBC Conglomerate, LLC

Further, even assuming that the Individual Defendants knew Plaintiff's residence was in Texas—which the…

Castro v. Georgetown Univ.

Nothing about this communication shows that Defendants took any action in or directed to Texas that gives…