From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tomaszewski v. Cleveland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 27, 1981
81 A.D.2d 1018 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Opinion

May 27, 1981

Appeal from the Erie Supreme Court.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Doerr and Moule, JJ. [ 103 Misc.2d 355.]


Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff, Lottie Tomaszewski, a New York resident, was injured on July 27, 1975 when the vehicle in which she was riding collided with another. The accident occurred in Florida and both defendants are Florida residents. Plaintiffs sued for personal injuries and derivative damages and attempted to obtain jurisdiction by attaching defendants' insurance policies in New York. Defendants asserted lack of jurisdiction in their answers and moved to dismiss the complaint on that ground. Special Term granted the motions, holding that the Supreme Court decision of Rush v Savchuk ( 444 U.S. 320) applied retroactively and that jurisdiction was not acquired by Seider-Roth (Seider v Roth, 17 N.Y.2d 111) attachment. In affirming we base our decision as to defendant Cleveland solely on plaintiffs' failure to complete service on him as the statute requires (CPLR 6213; Raphael v Gibson, 65 A.D.2d 553; Galbraith v Yancik, 77 Misc.2d 130), and as to defendant Martinez on the invalidity of the order of attachment and postattachment procedure (see 22 NYCRR 1039.13).


Summaries of

Tomaszewski v. Cleveland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 27, 1981
81 A.D.2d 1018 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)
Case details for

Tomaszewski v. Cleveland

Case Details

Full title:LOTTIE TOMASZEWSKI et al., Appellants, v. WILLIAM CLEVELAND, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 27, 1981

Citations

81 A.D.2d 1018 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)