Tomaso v. Sestak

Full title: Robert S. Tomaso, Appellee, v. Fred Sestak, Appellant

Court: Appellate Court of Illinois, Chicago, First District

Date published: Feb 2, 1944

321 Ill. App. 363 (Ill. App. Ct. 1944)

53 N.E.2d 134

Opinion

Gen. No. 42,341. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed February 2, 1944 Rehearing denied March 3, 1944

ON REHEARING.

AUTOMOBILES AND MOTOR VEHICLES, § 167.4^_ — when judgments for plaintiff in automobile collision case will be affirmed. On defendant's appeal from personal injuries and property damage judgments for plaintiff in automobile collision case, held that, as against defendant's contentions of lack of jurisdiction in municipal court which tried case, estoppel by verdict, and excessiveness of damages awarded for plaintiff's injuries, judgments would be affirmed.

_ See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. JOSEPH H. MCGARRY, Judge, presiding.

Judgments affirmed. Heard in the third division, first district, this court at the October term, 1942.

Rider Thuma and Chester D. Kern, for appellant;

Elliodor M. Libonati, for appellee;

Abraham Miller, of counsel;

Samuel Nicosia, amicus curiae.

Opinion by JUSTICE KILEY.

Not to be published In full. Opinion filed February 2, 1944; rehearing denied March 3, 1944.