Opinion
2012-09-13
In the Matter of Michel TOLIVER, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES et al., Respondents.
Michel Toliver, Wallkill, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondents.
Michel Toliver, Wallkill, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondents.
Before: PETERS, P.J., LAHTINEN, MALONE JR., KAVANAGH and McCARTHY, JJ.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with disobeying a direct order and violating a movement regulation after he refused a correction officer's direction to go to the clinic to retrieve his mandatory medication. Following a tier II disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of both charges. The determination was affirmed on administrative appeal and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the hearing testimony of the reporting officer, a facility nurse and petitioner's own admission that he did not report as directed, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Lashway v. Fischer, 91 A.D.3d 1239, 936 N.Y.S.2d 787 [2012],lv. denied19 N.Y.3d 805, 2012 WL 2036741 [2012];Matter of Crenshaw v. Fischer, 87 A.D.3d 1189, 1190, 929 N.Y.S.2d 346 [2011] ). Although petitioner claimed that, due to pain, he was unable to leave his bed to comply with the directive, this created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see Matter of Green v. Bradt, 79 A.D.3d 1566, 1567, 914 N.Y.S.2d 739 [2010],lv. denied16 N.Y.3d 709, 2011 WL 1237573 [2011] ). Notably, a facility nurse testified that petitioner had reported for medication the previous five days and petitioner acknowledged that he was able to leave his bed and stand for the inmate “count” approximately 30 minutes before he was ordered to report to the clinic.
Finally, petitioner's constitutional claims and assertion that the misbehavior report was issued in retaliation for grievances he filed are all being raised for the first time and, therefore, they are unpreserved for this Court's review ( see Matter of Hamilton v. Bezio, 76 A.D.3d 1125, 1126, 908 N.Y.S.2d 141 [2010];Matter of McCollum v. Fischer, 61 A.D.3d 1194, 876 N.Y.S.2d 766 [2009],lv. denied13 N.Y.3d 703, 2009 WL 2779303 [2009] ).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.