From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tokayer v. Kosher Sports Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 26, 2019
178 A.D.3d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

10675N Index 157471/16

12-26-2019

Ira Daniel TOKAYER, Esq., Plaintiff–Respondent, v. KOSHER SPORTS INC., et al., Defendants–Appellants.

The Law Office of Jason J. Rebhun, P.C., New York (Jason J. Rebhun of counsel), for appellants. Stropheus Law LLC, New York (Daniel M. Hartman of counsel), for respondent.


The Law Office of Jason J. Rebhun, P.C., New York (Jason J. Rebhun of counsel), for appellants.

Stropheus Law LLC, New York (Daniel M. Hartman of counsel), for respondent.

Friedman, J.P., Webber, Kern, Moulton, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lynn R. Kotler, J.), entered February 11, 2019, which, insofar as appealed from, in this action seeking to recover legal fees, granted plaintiff's motion for sanctions against defendants to the extent of awarding plaintiff the costs incurred in making the motion upon settling an order with notice supported by an affirmation attesting to costs and attorneys' fees incurred, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion in imposing the monetary sanction on defendants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130–1.1 for failing to comply with the so-ordered stipulation requiring them to produce an affidavit of diligent search by March 30, 2018 (see Vandashield Ltd v. Isaacson, 146 A.D.3d 552, 555–556, 46 N.Y.S.3d 18 [1st Dept. 2017] ). The court had a reasonable basis to conclude that, regardless of the surrounding circumstances, defendants' unexcused seven-month delay in producing the affidavit was frivolous, dilatory conduct sufficient to warrant the imposition of the limited sanction.

Contrary to defendants' contention, counsel's affirmation submitted with the motion for sanctions provided sufficient detail to comply with 22 NYCRR 202.7(c) (see Cuprill v Citywide Towing & Auto Repair Servs., 149 A.D.3d 442, 49 N.Y.S.3d 624 [1st Dept. 2017] ).

We have considered defendants' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Tokayer v. Kosher Sports Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 26, 2019
178 A.D.3d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Tokayer v. Kosher Sports Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Ira Daniel Tokayer, Esq., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Kosher Sports Inc., et…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 26, 2019

Citations

178 A.D.3d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 9395
112 N.Y.S.3d 501

Citing Cases

Robles v. 635 Owner LLC

W5 Group did recount, however, that it offered to produce its witness James Marrone to provide the…

Pursuit Credit Special Opportunity Fund v. Krunchcash, LLC

Defendants' challenges to the amount in legal fees and costs awarded are unpreserved (see Blue Ribbon Bags,…