From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Todd Equipment Leasing Co. v. Pierce Trading

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 26, 1978
63 A.D.2d 1018 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Opinion

June 26, 1978


In an action to recover payments allegedly due under an equipment lease, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 2, 1975, which denied its motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. On this record, the Special Term properly denied the appellant's motion for summary judgment. Rules of evidence should be guardedly and cautiously applied on an application for summary judgment (Phillips v Kantor Co., 31 N.Y.2d 307, 311-312). The doctrine of the law of the case, if it is involved here by virtue of an order of the Special Term in New York County, is not binding on the Appellate Division under these circumstances (10 Carmody-Wait 2d, N Y Prac, § 70.406). Titone, J.P., Suozzi, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Todd Equipment Leasing Co. v. Pierce Trading

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 26, 1978
63 A.D.2d 1018 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)
Case details for

Todd Equipment Leasing Co. v. Pierce Trading

Case Details

Full title:TODD EQUIPMENT LEASING COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Appellant, v. PIERCE TRADING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 26, 1978

Citations

63 A.D.2d 1018 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Citing Cases

Globe Indemnity Company v. Franklin Paving Co.

Said order, which merely denied a motion by counsel retained by the plaintiff insurance company to withdraw…