Opinion
October 4, 1907.
Henry Hetkin, for the appellant.
Albert A. Hovell, for the respondent.
The evidence shows that the plaintiff knew that the defendant was acting in a representative capacity, and not for himself. Judgment seems to have been given against him because he signed Stone's name without authority, but he did this at the plaintiff's insistence, the latter knowing that Stone had nothing to do with the matter ( Crandall v. Rollins, 83 App. Div. 618).
The judgment should be reversed.
JENKS, HOOKER, RICH and MILLER, JJ., concurred.
Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.