From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Title G. T. Co. v. 21st St. 5th Ave. Corp.

Supreme Court, New York Special Term
Jan 1, 1920
110 Misc. 126 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1920)

Opinion

January, 1920.

Cravath Henderson (R.H. Nielson and R.N. Chambers, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Leonard Klaber, for defendant Treo Company.

James Frank, for defendants Twenty-first Street and Fifth Avenue Corporation and Hudson Realty Company.

Rose Paskus, for defendants Isaac N. Heidelberg and Nora H. Heidelberg.

Wm. H. Freedman, for defendant Manhattan Wash Suit Company.


Since the Union Exchange National Bank, against which the action has been discontinued, is no longer a party, a decree of foreclosure would be a nullity as to it ( Brainard v. Cooper, 10 N.Y. 356, 358), and since that bank would not be bound by such a decree, the title which would be received by any purchaser on the foreclosure sale would be subject to the rights of the bank under its lease, the original term of which does not expire until May 1, 1922. Such a situation impairs the defendant Treo Company's right to an unimpaired equity of redemption. Furthermore, where the breach of a covenant for quiet enjoyment is due to the foreclosure of a mortgage on the property, a tenant is entitled to recover substantial damages, measured by the value of the unexpired term, less rents reserved, and to look for reimbursement to the surplus moneys which may be realized on the foreclosure sale. Mack v. Patchin, 42 N.Y. 167, 172; Clarkson v. Skidmore, 46 id. 297. The defendant Treo Company is therefore interested in having the property bring, on the foreclosure sale the best possible price. There is good reason to think that this cannot be accomplished if the property must be sold subject to the lease of the Union Exchange National Bank. The motion will be granted on the following terms: Unless the plaintiff stipulate that it will discontinue the action against the defendant Treo Company, the latter will be permitted to serve and file an amended answer, a copy of which is annexed to the moving papers.

If the plaintiff concludes to discontinue the action as against the defendant Treo Company, Inc., the motion for a reference will be granted; otherwise it must be denied because of the service of the amended answer.

Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

Title G. T. Co. v. 21st St. 5th Ave. Corp.

Supreme Court, New York Special Term
Jan 1, 1920
110 Misc. 126 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1920)
Case details for

Title G. T. Co. v. 21st St. 5th Ave. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:TITLE GUARANTEE AND TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff, v . TWENTY-FIRST STREET AND…

Court:Supreme Court, New York Special Term

Date published: Jan 1, 1920

Citations

110 Misc. 126 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1920)
180 N.Y.S. 358

Citing Cases

Standard Livestock Company v. Bank of California, National Association

The court held that the special term was justified in ruling that the lessee had shown no loss by the…