From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tishman v. Singer

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 8, 1989
537 So. 2d 718 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 87-3055.

February 8, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County; Hubert R. Lindsey; Judge.

Donald S. Hershman of Donald S. Hershman, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellants.

Mark B. Kleinfeld, of Jones Foster, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees.


We affirm the summary final judgment entered as to Count I and II, but decline to consider Count IV. The order directed to Count IV is not appealable per Rule 9.130 or Rule 9.030, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. White Palms of Palm Beach, Inc., v. Fox, 525 So.2d 518 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Russell v. Russell, 507 So.2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Paint v. Pompano Beach Bank Trust Co., 208 So.2d 152 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968). Consideration of all of the issues and arguments raised by appellant establishes that there are no genuine issues of fact left to be resolved and that the lower court correctly resolved Counts I and II.

AFFIRMED as to Counts I and II, and DISMISSED as to Count IV.

GLICKSTEIN and GARRETT, JJ., and KAHN, MARTIN D., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Tishman v. Singer

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 8, 1989
537 So. 2d 718 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Tishman v. Singer

Case Details

Full title:JERRY TISHMAN AND ROBERT PIASIO, APPELLANTS, v. DAVID SINGER, MURRAY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 8, 1989

Citations

537 So. 2d 718 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Hartmann v. Time

' Further, it has been held, whenever the question was raised, that the later mailing of miscellaneous…