Opinion
April 6, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Shapiro, J.).
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for a hearing to determine the intention of the parties with regard to that portion of the stipulation dated November 26, 1996, concerning payments made by the Social Security Administration on behalf of the parties' children, and whether those payments are to be credited against the defendant's child support obligation.
On November 26, 1996, the parties stipulated in open court to settle the defendant's child support arrears, estimated at $60,000, for $45,000, and to reduce the defendant's child support obligation from $300 per week to $230 per week, based upon the defendant's representation that he was receiving only $75 per week in disability payments. Although the parties acknowledged that the defendant was expecting to receive Social Security disability benefits for himself and his children, it is unclear if they intended that the defendant receive a credit against his child support payments for those Social Security benefits which are paid on behalf of the children.
Where the terms of a stipulation are ambiguous, the court may consider extrinsic evidence as to the intent of the parties (see, Derasmo v. Derasmo, 190 A.D.2d 655; Ackerberg v. Ackerberg, 154 A.D.2d 414). Accordingly, a hearing is required to determine the intention of the parties on the issue of whether the defendant may take a credit in his child support payments to reflect the Social Security disability payments received on behalf of the parties' children.
Rosenblatt, J.P., Sullivan, Joy, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.