From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tilghman v. State

Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division B
Apr 17, 1953
64 So. 2d 555 (Fla. 1953)

Opinion

April 17, 1953.

Appeal from the Criminal Court of Record, Polk County, R.H. Amidon, J.

Raymond E. Tilghman, in pro. per.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Bart L. Cohen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


This is the second appearance of this cause before this Court. See Tilghman v. State, Fla., 51 So.2d 785, wherein conviction and judgment were affirmed. That judgment of affirmance set at rest all questions presented on that appeal. Such questions may not be subsequently presented to the trial court without application granted by the Supreme Court to so present same. See Kinsey v. State, 155 Fla. 159, 19 So.2d 706; Skipper v. Schumacker, 118 Fla. 867, 160 So. 357.

If any error was made by the lower court in resentencing the appellant on his presentation of the petition for relief (absent the affirmative action of the Supreme Court) and in reducing the original sentence by five years, the result was favorable to and not against the appellant and, therefore, he may not be heard to complain. Excessive sentence does not vitiate judgment.

Affirmed.

ROBERTS, C.J., and THOMAS and DREW, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tilghman v. State

Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division B
Apr 17, 1953
64 So. 2d 555 (Fla. 1953)
Case details for

Tilghman v. State

Case Details

Full title:TILGHMAN v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division B

Date published: Apr 17, 1953

Citations

64 So. 2d 555 (Fla. 1953)

Citing Cases

Tilghman v. Mayo

Petitioner Raymond E. Tilghman was convicted of breaking and entering a store with an intent to commit a…

Tilghman v. Culver

Petitioner was convicted of breaking and entering a store with intent to commit a felony on June 15, 1950,…