From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thrasher v. Garland

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Oct 12, 2007
CASE NO. C06-5496RBL-KLS (W.D. Wash. Oct. 12, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. C06-5496RBL-KLS.

October 12, 2007


ORDER


The Court, having reviewed defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. #27), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) Plaintiff has moved for an Extension of Time to Respond to the Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. #35]. However, the record reflects that plaintiff filed a response in opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss on August 13, 2007, consisting of a memorandum and 70 pages of exhibits. [Dkt. #28]. The Magistrate Judge, in her Report and Recommendation, specifically referred to plaintiff's response. Therefore, plaintiff's motion for an extension of time [Dkt. #35] is DENIED.

(2) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.

(3) Defendant's motion is GRANTED.

(4) Plaintiff's complaint is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies.

(5) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, defendant's counsel and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom.


Summaries of

Thrasher v. Garland

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Oct 12, 2007
CASE NO. C06-5496RBL-KLS (W.D. Wash. Oct. 12, 2007)
Case details for

Thrasher v. Garland

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL THRASHER, Plaintiff, v. LARRY GARLAND, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Oct 12, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. C06-5496RBL-KLS (W.D. Wash. Oct. 12, 2007)

Citing Cases

Tran v. Metha

In Anaya, the magistrate judge observed: The undersigned is aware of conflicting decisions at the district…

Donte v. Swingle

Therefore, the undersigned finds that defendant's motion has been properly brought. See Tyner v. Schriro,…